What do students really understand from representations?
One thing that’s always bothered me about chemistry is the amount of information that’s hidden away in seemingly innocuous words or diagrams. For example, if I use the word ‘hydrogen’, do I mean a hydrogen atom or a molecule? Is it just one molecule or am I talking about a cylinder-full?
Mechanisms are even more complicated. There are lines for representing a pair of electrons and there are other lines for showing movement of a pair of electrons. Then sometimes we don’t even bother showing the electrons.
Imagine a student presented with a reaction scheme, something we use to represent a chemical reaction. If the student considers only the functional groups or reagents to understand how the reactants turn into the products, then they would be doing so using perceptual attributes only – a surface level interpretation of the information. But if the student considers the mechanism or formation of intermediates, they would be using relational attributes – a much deeper level of interpretation showing they can relate the representation to its meaning.
A recent study probed the perceptual and relational attributes that new chemistry undergraduate students use to categorise chemical reactions.
Thanks for using Education in Chemistry. You can view one Education in Chemistry article per month as a visitor.
Registration is open to all teachers and technicians at secondary schools, colleges and teacher training institutions in the UK and Ireland.
Get all this, plus much more:
Already a Teach Chemistry member? Sign in now.
Not eligible for Teach Chemistry? Sign up for a personal account instead, or you can also access all our resources with Royal Society of Chemistry membership.