Call for clarity on Science Diploma and 'Standards bubble' bursts
David Fox, Pfizer Global R&D
I enjoyed reading Ken Gadd's article on the advanced Science Diploma in the last issue (Educ. Chem., 2010, 47 (1), 2). Gadd made clear the opportunities and challenges associated with this diploma. However, I would like to challenge his assertion at the end, where he states: 'the notion that a different core of scientific and mathematical skills and knowledge is needed if a student is going into employment as opposed to HE [higher education] is difficult to justify.'
As an employer and as a parent, I think the advanced Science Diploma has the potential to be an outstanding product. My worry is that it will falter as a result of confusion among teachers, students and parents on the crucial question of who it is aimed at.
The cross-disciplinary and exploratory approach to learning would, I believe, offer different benefits to different cohorts. At the top-end, it could represent the gold standard for A-levels, providing a suitable mix of subject content, contextualisation and the opportunity to develop thinking/problem-solving skills. This is a potent combination that HE and research-based employers will be crying out for over the next decade.
Thanks for using Education in Chemistry. You can view one Education in Chemistry article per month as a visitor.
Registration is open to all teachers and technicians at secondary schools, colleges and teacher training institutions in the UK and Ireland.
Get all this, plus much more:
Already a Teach Chemistry member? Sign in now.
Not eligible for Teach Chemistry? Sign up for a personal account instead, or you can also access all our resources with Royal Society of Chemistry membership.