Distillate: David Read looks at recent chemical education research
Chemists use a complex combination of jargon and graphics to communicate information, and it should be no surprise that students can find it difficult to adapt to this new ‘language’ of multiple representations. Hilton and Nichols have carried out a study which probed students’ understanding of different representations in relation to the vital topic of chemical bonding.
In their introduction, the authors revisit the suggestion that there are three levels of representation in chemistry; macroscopic, sub-microscopic and symbolic. They propose that students’ misconceptions arise from the misguided use of different forms of representation by past teachers, adding to the mystery of chemistry rather than clarifying it. In particular, symbolic representations, communicating little information about underlying phenomena, can be problematic.
Thanks for using Education in Chemistry. You can view one Education in Chemistry article per month as a visitor.
Registration is open to all teachers and technicians at secondary schools, colleges and teacher training institutions in the UK and Ireland.
Get all this, plus much more:
Already a Teach Chemistry member? Sign in now.
Not eligible for Teach Chemistry? Sign up for a personal account instead, or you can also access all our resources with Royal Society of Chemistry membership.