Nina Notman’s thoughts turn to the chemists preparing to destroy Syria’s chemical arsenal at sea
As a chemist and a journalist, I can frequently be found on my soapbox when chemicals are unfairly portrayed as ‘bad’ by the media. But there are a handful of chemicals out there that are bad. Appallingly, irredeemably, bad. The world received a shocking reminder of that last year when chemical weapons were used to gas civilians in Syria.
After five apparent practice runs earlier in the year, on 21 August 2013 an estimated 1500 Syrian’s were killed by exposure to the nerve gas sarin in the suburbs of Damascus. Backlash from the international community over this attack led to Syria finally agreeing to sign the Chemical Weapons Convention. Implemented by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, this convention prohibits the use, production and stockpiling of chemical weapons in all its signature countries. Syria has agreed to the destruction of its entire chemical weapons programme by 30 June 2014. This is phenomenally fast, when you consider that the US is not estimated to complete destroying its own stockpile until 2023.
Thanks for using Education in Chemistry. You can view one Education in Chemistry article per month as a visitor.
Registration is open to all teachers and technicians at secondary schools, colleges and teacher training institutions in the UK and Ireland.
Get all this, plus much more:
Already a Teach Chemistry member? Sign in now.
Not eligible for Teach Chemistry? Sign up for a personal account instead, or you can also access all our resources with Royal Society of Chemistry membership.