Paul Yates overcomes some common misconceptions and misunderstandings encountered when dealing with fractions
Despite being one of the earlier concepts met in a school career, many students have problems using fractions competently, even at undergraduate level. There is a wealth of educational research in this area.
Fractions are often conceived as being different from whole numbers, and the concepts and properties of whole numbers are regularly applied incorrectly when dealing with fractions.1 Kristie Newton identified a persistent error in adding numerators and denominators in the addition of fractions, while Cemalettin Isik noted an ignorance of the conceptual structure of fractional division.2
A number of suggestions have been made about teaching fractions, although at a relatively early stage in students' education. These include:
- accelerating learning through the support provided by both teaching and textbooks
- students' need to gain conceptual as well as procedural knowledge
- using different representations and alternating between representations
- teaching students more than one approach to solve a task
- including activities that involve explanation and justification using words and figures
Anatomy of a fraction
Any fraction, such as 2/3, can be thought of as consisting of three parts. Symbolically
The numerator is simply the number on top, in this case 2. The denominator is 3, the number on the bottom. The third component is the horizontal line or divisor, which simply tells us that the numerical operation we are performing here is division. In this case we are dividing 2 by 3 such that
The division sign ÷ is rarely used in scientific writing – we normally express the division operation in terms of a fraction.
The most important thing to remember when performing any operations with fractions is that we can multiply the numerator and the denominator by the same quantity and it will remain unchanged. For example
Addition and subtraction
In some ways, these are the hardest operations to perform with fractions. The critical thing to remember is that we can only add or subtract fractions that have the same denominator. So if we wish to perform the addition
We need to recognise that
The summation then becomes
The reciprocal of a fraction is simply the fraction inverted and is usually denoted by the superscript index -1. So the reciprocal of 2/3 is
It is also possible to define the reciprocal of a non-fractional number. We can write any number in terms of a fraction with denominator 1, such as
Its reciprocal is then
It is worth noting that if we take the reciprocal again we obtain our original number.
Multiplication and division
To multiply fractions together we simply multiply the numerators to give the final numerator, and similarly multiply the denominators to give the final denominator.
To divide a fraction by another fraction, we multiply by the reciprocal of the dividing fraction. For example
In this final example we also have the case of the resulting fraction not being the simplest possible version. Since both numerator and denominator are even, each can be divided by 2 so that
Other simplifications are generally less obvious and in chemistry it is rarely an issue to express a fraction in its simplest form. Raising a fraction to a power is a special case of multiplication. For example
We raise the numerator to that power to give the new numerator, and the denominator to the same power to give the new denominator.
Examples in chemistry
1. Mole fractions
In a mixture of two components, 1 and 2, we can calculate the amounts of each component as n1 and n2. These would have units of moles. The mole fractions x1 and x2 of each are then defined as
In a proprietary alcohol solution, each 100 g contains 65.0 g (1.08 mol) of isopropyl alcohol (C3H7OH) and 35.0 g (1.94 mol) of water.3 The mole fractions of the two components are therefore
The mole fraction has no units, and the individual mole fractions in a mixture will always add to exactly 1.
2. Spectroscopy of hydrogen-like atoms
The wavenumber, ṽ, is defined as the reciprocal of the wavelength, λ, in a spectrum:
For hydrogen-like atoms this frequency can be predicted by the Balmer-Rydberg-Ritz formula
where R is the Rydberg constant (1.0974 x 107 m-1), Z is the atomic number of the element, and n1 and n2 are integers denoting the energy levels between which the transition takes place.
For the transition between levels 4 and 5 of hydrogen itself (Z=1) we therefore have4
It follows that
3. Arrhenius equation
This equation describes how rate constants vary with temperature, in terms of the activation energy (Ea) for a reaction. If the rate constant is k1 at absolute temperature T1, and k2 at absolute temperature T2, the equation can be written
It is possible to rewrite this expression in such a way as to eliminate the reciprocal terms, if we remember that we can multiply both numerator and denominator by the same quantity. In this case we can write
since the two terms now have the same denominator. The overall equation now becomes
For the hydrolysis of 1-chloro-1- methylcycloheptane, [(CH2)6CClCH3] in ethanol, the rate constant is 3.19 x 10-4 s-1 at 298 K (k1) and 2.92 x 10-3 s-1 at 318 K (k2).5 So we calculate
Rearranging the Arrhenius equation now gives
which is better expressed as 87.2 kJ mol-1 to an appropriate number of significant figures.
Note that using this equation involves calculating T2 – T1 and T1 T2 rather than the smaller reciprocal quantities, which students may feel less comfortable dealing with.
Paul Yates is the discipline lead for the physical sciences at the Higher Education Academy.
Fractions maths for chemistsPDF, Size 0.35 mb
- T R Post et al, in T P Carpenter, E Fennema, and T A Romberg (eds), Rational numbers: An integration of research, p327. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993
- C Işik and T Kar, Educ. Sci.: Theory, Pract., 2012, 12, 2303
D D Ebbing, General chemistry (5th ed), p532. Houghton Mifflin, 1996
K J Laidler and J H Meiser, Physical chemistry (3rd ed), p548.
Houghton Mifflin, 1999R J Silbey and R A Alberty, Physical chemistry (3rd ed), p698. John Wiley, 2001
1 Reader's comment