Time, trust and communication are key to ensuring a smooth move from primary to secondary science learning for both students and teachers
Many students find the transition from primary to secondary science tricky. While an attainment and engagement dip around transition is well documented, it is unclear what is driving this specifically in science.
Many students find the transition from primary to secondary science tricky. While an attainment and engagement dip around transition is well documented, it is unclear what is driving this specifically in science (bit.ly/4wIJLLo).
One recurring issue is a mismatch in how confident primary and secondary teachers feel about students’ science learning. Primary teachers are often confident that students leave primary school having met curriculum expectations, while their secondary colleagues are far less certain that students are ready for secondary science. This difference shapes how science is structured in early secondary, often leading to either over-repetition or gaps in learning as students adjust to a more cumulative, concept-driven curriculum.
What are the barriers to success?
Several issues sit behind this challenging transition. It is difficult to build continuity, for example, when there are such limited opportunities for primary and secondary teachers to get together to share knowledge and discuss curriculum content, assessment, practical work or student experiences.
Curriculum gaps are also a key factor. It’s not simply about content coverage, but differences in curriculum time, lesson structure and subject expertise. While national guidance makes it clear that secure understanding at the end of primary is essential for progression in early secondary, there is often a jump in expectations. Primary builds broad understanding across topics, while secondary introduces three disciplines, specialist vocabulary and more formal approaches to enquiry. Students also move from largely concrete concepts to more abstract ones. They may succeed in primary school electricity lessons by building circuits and using symbols and diagrams, but struggle in secondary with abstract ideas such as resistance.
There’s also a practical gap. Research suggests that practical work is most effective when students have the prior knowledge and vocabulary needed to interpret observations. They may arrive at secondary having completed practical activities, but without a secure understanding of purpose or outcomes. The Ofsted science research review highlights that experiments where students cannot interpret results or lack sufficient time to consolidate learning can reinforce misconceptions.
There’s also a practical gap. Research suggests that practical work is most effective when students have the prior knowledge and vocabulary needed to interpret observations (bit.ly/4wWzfjH). They may arrive in secondary having completed practical activities, but without a secure understanding of purpose or outcomes. The Ofsted science research review highlights that experiments where students cannot interpret results or lack sufficient time to consolidate learning can reinforce misconceptions (bit.ly/4wGKson).
Even limited but regular cross-phase communication can improve continuity
Students may also expect big experiments involving Bunsen burners or explosions and feel disappointed when early lessons are dominated by routines, lab safety and teacher‑led demonstrations. This mismatch shapes students’ early attitudes to science, undermining engagement.
Repetition is also a big issue when secondary teachers are unsure of their students’ prior knowledge. But without careful assessment, repetition can lead to disengagement and fail to address the root causes of students’ difficulties.
What can you do?
Some of these challenges can be addressed at a classroom level, while others require leadership input. Diagnostic questions and low‑stakes quizzes can provide a clear picture of students’ understanding at the beginning of a topic and inform planning around prior knowledge and misconceptions. Consistently starting all units with a prior knowledge quiz, followed by a lesson that addresses gaps in the knowledge needed to access new learning, is a good starting step.
Some of these challenges can be addressed at a classroom level, while others require leadership input. Diagnostic questions and low‑stakes quizzes can provide a clear picture of students’ understanding at the beginning of a topic and inform planning around prior knowledge and misconceptions (rsc.li/4dzIYUe). Consistently starting all units with a prior knowledge quiz, followed by a lesson that addresses gaps in the knowledge needed to access new learning, is a good starting step.
What can leadership do?
Establishing shared curriculum understanding across upper primary and lower secondary requires time and trust. Speak to your leadership team about creating opportunities for you to meet with primary colleagues and review curriculum maps, agree key ideas and vocabulary and align expectations around practical science together. Even limited but regular cross-phase communication can improve continuity. Students benefit most when teachers understand one another’s contexts and work together to create a more coherent experience of science.
Questions for department heads to consider
- What are your main transition challenges?
- Which issues can be addressed in the classroom?
- Which require leadership action or structural change?
- How is assessment used at the start of secondary learning to inform teaching?
- How well aligned are upper primary and lower secondary expectations for practical science?
- What information from upper primary teachers would most support planning?
Georgie Pick was a head of science in a North London secondary school and is now principal development lead for the Ark Curriculum Plus science mastery programme
No comments yet