Use these 5 teacher-tested ideas to help students get on top of this challenging topic and perform better in exams

An old wooden molecule modeling set

Source: © P_Wei/Getty Images

Use these classroom ideas to engage students when teaching structure and bonding

The topic of structure and bonding is known to be a bit of a challenge. It underpins so much of the other chemistry that students encounter and to us, as expert teachers, it can seem relatively simple. However, to 14–16 students it is very abstract, making use of models which themselves rely on understanding atomic structure. It’s also difficult to find classroom activities that are engaging and add variety to lessons. This adds up to it being a difficult topic where we often find ourselves correcting students making incorrect statements long into their post-16 education.

Here are five ways to teach this tricky topic and boost your students’ understanding.

1. Consider the context

There is no perfect sequence for the teaching the three different ‘types’ of bonding structures covered in the 14–16 age range. It very much depends on when you introduce atomic structure and how secure students are with the core concepts of that topic. Beware of just taking an off-the-peg resource or following a syllabus sequence before considering it in the context of your cohort. This is definitely a discussion to have as a department, taking into account the experiences of students with different levels of prior achievement and the skills and experience of your teaching staff.

Structure strips to support this topic

  • Preview of the allotropes of carbon structure strips on a red-orange background

    Allotropes of carbon

    Find out about the structure and bonding of carbon where it forms different macromolecular structures, with a follow-up question on diamond in drill bits.

  • Preview of the covalent bonding structure strips on a red-orange background

    Covalent bonding

    Gain an understanding of covalent bonding diagrams and their limitationsm with a follow-up question on different representations of ethane.

  • Preview of the covalent bonding structure strips on a red-orange background

    Ionic bonding

    Describe ion formation and practise drawing dot and cross diagrams of atoms and ions to show electron transfer then discuss the limitations of these models.

  • Preview of the metallic bonding structure strips on a red-orange background

    Metallic bonding

    Retrieve information on the metallic bonding model and explain how this leads to metals having particular properties. With a follow-up question on copper in saucepans.

2. Make the abstract more concrete

Physical models help secure students’ knowledge far better than textbooks or PowerPoint diagrams. There are lots of commercial models available, for example Molymod structures of the bonding in a diamond, but these can be expensive if your school doesn’t already have them. Thankfully, informal models from craft materials can be just as powerful. For example, we have a very old set of models of giant ionic structures made of painted wooden spheres which show the lattice packing very clearly. Have a dig around in your school’s store cupboards and ask colleagues, especially technicians, to find what’s available. Plan how you will use them in class and how you want students to interact with the models.

3. Model thinking with decision trees

Ask yourself what processes you go through to decide what category of bonding an element or compound belongs to. Often students struggle to construct this kind of internal narrative. Distil it into decision trees or dichotomous key style diagrams to make the thinking much more obvious, and even improve exam success. Construct these with students and then provide them as a resource to support them in writing answers to questions – this is particularly helpful for lower achievers. As students gain confidence, remove the support so they can internalise the thinking.

4. Refine, refine, refine

Learners commonly use far more words than they need when tackling questions on structure and bonding. Remind them that the exam board tend to be very generous in their allowance of lines for written answers, and they don’t have to fill them all. It takes time and practice to help students write efficiently. Take their waffly answers and edit them to refine each one to the best it can be. My mantra is always: fewer, better words. Blanking out the unnecessary words with a black marker can be a really striking way of showing students where they’re wasting time and potentially robbing themselves of marks. Students really enjoy taking a black marker to each other’s (photocopied!) work.

More resources

5. Focus on assessment as exams approach

The structure and bonding content at 14–16 hasn’t changed in many years, but exam boards can be quite picky with mark schemes. I really dislike focusing purely on assessment when exploring chemistry, but it is a necessary evil as exams get nearer.

The emphasis and marking points for bonding questions vary slightly for different exam boards and have changed over time. For this reason, you might find that past paper answers to the questions you use in class are subtly different to the ones your students will be marked on in their final exams. This is particularly true if you pull exam questions from a database that includes several years of assessments. For example, a few years ago, my colleague had a top strategy for getting all the marks in an answer explaining the high melting point of an ionic compound. He used to teach the students the acronym SEABOCI – strong electrostatic attraction between oppositely charged ions – which would get them three marks. But, more recently, examiners require students to state that the attraction acts in all directions in a giant lattice, and mention energy. So, in revision sessions close to the exams focus on the marking points for the most recent exams.

Kristy Turner